Ten years ago I asked the following question in a column titled "It's Time To Part Company":
"If one group of people prefers government control and management of people's lives and another prefers liberty and a desire to be left alone, should they be required to fight, antagonize one another, risk bloodshed and loss of life in order to impose their preferences or should they be able to peaceably part company and go their separate ways?"
The problem that our nation faces is very much like a marriage where one partner has broken, and has no intention of keeping, the marital vows. Of course, the marriage can remain intact and one party tries to impose his will on the other and engage in the deviousness of one-upmanship. Rather than submission by one party or domestic violence, a more peaceable alternative is separation.
I believe we are nearing a point where there are enough irreconcilable differences between those Americans who want to control other Americans and those Americans who want to be left alone that separation is the only peaceable alternative. Just as in a marriage, where vows are broken, our human rights protections guaranteed by the U.S. Constitution have been grossly violated by a government instituted to protect them.
Thursday, April 08, 2010
Walter E. Williams (This Week's Guest!): Does U.S. Need To Split Along Political Lines? - IBD/ Investors.com
The good Professor will be my guest tomorrow on Unspun where we'll discuss the following topic, among others, I'm sure:
Read the rest here: Does U.S. Need To Split Along Political Lines? - IBD - Investors.com
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
190 comments:
Post a Comment