Saturday, September 22, 2001

Study Finds Increasing Number of Crossers at Mexican Border Are From Other Countries [Free Republic]Study
Finds Increasing Number of Crossers at Mexican Border Are From Other Countries




Published:
Sep 22, 2001


TUCSON, Ariz. (AP) - The illegal entrants being caught by the Border Patrol
along the Arizona sector of the boundary increasingly are from nations other
than Mexico, officials say.

"We don't know what it means," spokesman Rene Noriega said Friday.

Total illegal entrant apprehensions within the Border Patrol's Tucson sector
- all of the Arizona-Mexico border except the southwestern corner near Yuma -
are down about 26 percent, from 601,879 last year to 443,910 this year.

At the same time, the number of other-than-Mexican detentions has grown by 42
percent, from 2,032 last year to 2,886 this year.

Most of the non-Mexican migrants are from El Salvador and other parts of
Central America, but agents have picked up people from all over the world,
including the former Soviet Union, Asia, and the Middle East.

Ten Egyptians were arrested recently near Douglas. Each had paid $7,000 to be
brought from Guatemala into Mexico and then across the border, Border Patrol
spokesman Rob Daniels said.



Pat Buchanan on Immigration



Stop the invasion from the south; limit immigration


Buchanan said his exclusion from the three televised debates between
Bush and Gore kept viewers from a real discussion of issues like immigration.
“One of the great social crises of this country is unrestricted immigration
and an invasion from the south,” he said. “I will cut back legal immigration
to 250,000 a year and I will defend America’s border, if necessary with
American troops.”
Source: Zachary Coile,
San Francisco Examiner Oct 27, 2000

Use troops to stop illegal immigration


Buchanan said America needs leaders who will “halt illegal
immigration cold at our borders even if we have to have troops. We need to
repair, rebuild and restore the melting pot.”
Source:
Kristen Hays, Associated Press Jul 27, 1999

PLATFORM - KEEPING OUR SONS AND DAUGHTERS OUT OF WAR

AMERICA'S SOVEREIGNTY IS MORE IMPORTANT THAN OUR TRADE

AMERICA IS ABOUT MORE THAN MONEY!


" Our vital national interests are the security and sovereignty of the
U.S.A. Now that the extraordinary era of the Cold War is over, we need a more
traditional American foreign policy for more traditional times to keep us out of
the kind of wars that have destroyed every other great power in history.

In the words of John Quincy Adams, our greatest Secretary of State,
"Wherever the standard of freedom and independence has been or shall be
unfurled, there will [America's] heart, her benedictions, and her prayers be.
But she goes not abroad in search of monsters to destroy."

When U.S. interests are threatened, or our citizens attacked, or our honor
impugned, America will fight-
but we will not commit our forces carelessly or
sacrifice American soldiers to save the faces of foolhardy interventionists.

We will withdraw from all United Nations and global organizations that do
not serve U.S. interests. Not one dime from the International Monetary Fund will
go to prop up corrupt foreign regimes or countries hostile to the United States.
And not one United States soldier will be forced to swear allegiance to an
international organization."





Wednesday, September 19, 2001

No national pride inspired in US Muslims [Free Republic]

Mohamed Aissaoui, a son of New York City, wants to be a politician when he grows up; whatever else he lacks, the rhetoric is there already.



"The only take you can have on it is as a Muslim," says the 14-year-old outside Al Qaraween Islamic bookstore on Atlantic Avenue, Brooklyn, several blocks of which is a heavily Islamic neighbourhood.


"You're Muslim first and American second. We can only do as our religion says: we should fight back."

Saudis Cast Doubt Over FBI List of Hijackers [Free Republic]

DUBAI (Reuters) - Saudi officials and media have cast doubt on the credibility of a list of 19 suspects named by U.S. investigators as suicide hijackers, saying some of them are alive and innocent.

The FBI last week identified 19 men as hijackers, including seven trained pilots, who it said commandeered the four passenger jets used in the attacks that left nearly 6,000 were dead and missing. Although the FBI list did not provide the nationalities of the suspects, Gulf officials and analysts said the family names appeared to indicate that many of them were Saudi nationals. "The haste in publishing the names of suspects in the attacks has made the media fall into the error of involving innocent people, especially Saudis, who later proved that they were innocent," said Prince Mit'eb bin Abdullah bin Abdul-Aziz, deputy commander of the Saudi National Guards. The apparent errors over the names have strengthened a belief in the Gulf that the real attackers used false or stolen passports and documents.


A Saudi Foreign Ministry official said authorities in the kingdom had doubts about the list, just before Foreign Minister Prince Saud al-Faisal flew to Washington to help U.S. efforts to hunt the perpetrators of the attacks. "We have our own doubts because many of those implicated have turned out to be alive here or elsewhere," he said. Saudi newspapers have published interviews and pictures of at least five of those who appeared on the FBI list since it was released Friday.


Monday, August 27, 2001

Sharp rise in parents saying no to vaccines [Free Republic]
EXCELLENT POINT: The FBI Can't Be Trusted to Vet Judges [Free Republic]
COMMENTARY

The FBI Can't Be Trusted to Vet Judges


When
a spy agency knows personal secrets, it has the potential to influence judicial
decisions.

By STEPHEN YAGMAN, Stephen Yagman, a Venice Beach federal civil
rights lawyer, was special prosecutor for the state of Idaho in the Ruby Ridge
prosecution of an FBI sniper



Serious people of all political stripes should question
whether it is appropriate for the FBI to continue to be the agency that vets our
federal judges.

In the past 10 years, the FBI has brought itself into
disrepute and disgrace, yet its false pride continues unabated.

One need
not go back to the days of yesteryear to question the bureau's competency and
integrity. Back then, J. Edgar Hoover's FBI not only Red-baited, it denied that
the mob existed and refused to investigate federal civil rights violations--all
the while righteously blowing its own horn.

For years, the most glaring
example of bureau misconduct was the famed Rosenberg espionage trial, where, in
an attempt to influence the outcome and ensure the death penalty, Hoover had
illegal conversations with the judge overseeing the case.

The FBI today
continues to be an incredibly effective propaganda machine, having mastered the
techniques it learned from its erstwhile paper tiger enemy--the Soviet
Union.

Some recent examples:

* Ruby Ridge. On Aug. 22,
1992, FBI agents surrounded a broken-down cabin in northern Idaho and killed an
unarmed woman holding a 10-month-old baby by shooting the woman in the
head.

No legal consequences befell the sniper who fired the fatal shot,
nor were his superiors punished for writing clearly unconstitutional rules of
engagement that made the fatal shot possible.

* Waco, Texas. On
April 19, 1993, the FBI stormed the Branch Davidian compound. When it was done,
more than 80 men, women and small children were dead.

Though then-Atty.
Gen. Janet Reno took full responsibility for what the FBI did, it later became
clear that Reno had been duped by the agency into believing the actions it
proposed taking had little risk.

* Wen Ho Lee. In 1998, the FBI
caused the jailing--mostly in shackled solitary confinement--of Taiwan-born
American scientist Wen Ho Lee.

When Lee finally got his freedom after
nine months, the federal judge chastised the FBI, among other government
agencies, for misleading him.

* Robert Philip Hanssen. In 2000, it
was learned that long-time FBI counterintelligence agent Robert Philip Hanssen
was a Russian spy whom the bureau itself had been unable to identify or catch
and whose spying had resulted in a number of assassinations.

Once Hanssen
was caught and charged, the FBI made sure a quick plea bargain was worked out so
that the fiasco would go away quickly and quietly.

* Timothy McVeigh.
The FBI, unconstitutionally and in violation of a federal judge's order,
concealed evidence from Oklahoma City mass murderer Timothy McVeigh that should
have been available to his defense team.

Throughout all this, the FBI has
been the agency responsible--using both retired and active agents--for
investigating and vetting federal judicial nominees.

In that vetting, the
FBI interrogates not only the nominees, but also their families, friends,
neighbors and business associates. It gets their tax returns. It learns the most
intimate details of nominees' lives and puts all this information into its
files.

The peccadilloes or idiosyncrasies of those headed for judicial
office--such as the homosexuality of G. Harrold Carswell, the federal appeals
judge from Florida whom President Nixon nominated to the U.S. Supreme Court--can
be held confidentially, or not.

Once a nominee is confirmed and seated on
the bench, just knowing that the FBI possessed such information could influence
his or her decisions.

There is no legitimate reason to, and many good
reasons not to, let the FBI continue to investigate federal judicial
nominees.

It is too difficult to know how the agency might use the
confidential information it gets. Its powers are too great, its mentality and
institutional history too blemished and its competence and credibility too
low.

Any confidence in its integrity is clearly unwarranted.

There
is good reason to establish an independent, joint executive-legislative branch
office to vet federal judicial nominees.

This would ensure that when FBI
agents make their frequent appearances before federal judges to obtain arrest,
search and eavesdropping warrants and to give testimony in criminal trials,
these judges won't feel an inclination or an obligation to do whatever the FBI
tells them to do.

Thursday, August 23, 2001

Scheer Lunacy at The Los Angeles Times [Free Republic]


Re: my post #36 on this thread: Reading the Left Angeles Times, these letters were published in today's Slimes:


About the only stereotype missing from your portrayal of folks down here in Georgia was the potbellied, cigar-chomping, shotgun-toting sheriff ("Obscure Law Used to Jail Day Laborers in Georgia," Aug. 21).

When did acceptance of illegal immigration and loitering become the litmus test for tolerance? It is not a crime to look for work, as one of the self-admitted illegal aliens quoted in the story complains. But it is a crime under federal law to enter the country without permission and to work here. It is a crime in virtually every jurisdiction in this country to loiter. Zoning laws, by definition, restrict what people can do and where they can do it.

"A backlash against immigrants" is nothing more than decent, hard-working citizens demanding that their government enforce laws that protect their jobs, safety and quality of life.

Jane Russell
Atlanta


I had to laugh when I read about the landscaping contractor in Forsyth County, Ga., who hires illegal aliens and says, "But they're not crime people. They're here to work." Since when is entering this country illegally not a crime? As long as the illegals only flooded the Southwestern states, Congress turned a blind eye to it. Now that they're invading the rest of the country, maybe this problem will get the attention it deserves.

Gregory Daniels
Fillmore


Lie Back And Enjoy It? [Free Republic]
What Happened When Well-to-Do Parents Tried to Prep a Public School for Their Kids [Free Republic]

Tuesday, August 21, 2001

Reading the Left Angeles Times: Hugh Hewitt autopsies latest victim of New Media [Free Republic]
Say it Ain't so; Do liberals have a point? [Free Republic]

"I joined the party for different reasons. I found a party that sees me as an individual, not as part of a group. I found a party that puts family first. I found a party that has love of liberty at its core, and I found a party that believes that peace begins with strength."


-- Condoleeza Rice, speaking at the Republican National Convention of 2000.

TIME Cover Story: Home Sweet School [Free Republic]

Wednesday, July 18, 2001

Ashcroft pushes new gun policy: Attorney General reinterprets the Constitution

The “classic” view of the Second Amendment as an individual right was memorably provided by Mr. Justice Story (1842):


“The right of the citizens to keep and bear arms has justly been considered, as the palladium of the liberties of a republic; since it offers a strong moral check against the usurpation and arbitrary power of rulers; and will generally, even if these are successful in the first instance, enable the people to resist and triumph over them. And yet, though this truth would seem so clear, and the importance of a well regulated militia would seem so undeniable, it cannot be disguised, that among the American people there is a growing indifference to any system of militia discipline . . . There is certainly no small danger, that indifference may lead to disgust, and disgust to contempt; and thus gradually undermine all the protection intended by this clause of our national bill of rights."

More recently, Mr. Justice Scalia wrote (in A Matter of Interpretation, 1997):

“...[W]e value the right to bear arms less than did the Founders (who thought the right to self-defense to be absolutely fundamental), and there will be few tears shed if and when the Second Amendment is held to guarantee nothing more than the state National Guard. But this just shows the Founders were right when they feared that some (in their view misguided) future generation might wish to abandon liberties that they considered essential, and so sought to protect those liberties in a Bill of Rights. We may...like elimination of the right to bear arms; but let us not pretend that these are not the reductions of rights.”

Wednesday, July 04, 2001

Parents needing "oversight" by a government agency. A concept beyond frightening. The status of a child's education has nothing to do with it.
Right you are. This is what's behind the PR push in AZ:
B-67. Home Schooling. "The National Education Association believes that home schooling programs cannot provide the student with a comprehensive education experience. When home schooling occurs, students enrolled must meet all state requirements. Home schooling should be limited to the children of the immediate family, with all expenses being borne by the parents/guardians. Instruction should be by persons who are licensed by the appropriate state education licensure agency, and a curriculum approved by the state department of education should be used.[italics mine] The Association also believes that home-schooled students should not participate in any extracurricular activities in the public schools."
See, it's all about power and control, and making sure the parents don't have any. As far as testing goes for public-schooled children, here's another "resolution" adopted by the NEA:
B-55. Standardized Testing of Students. "The Association opposes the use of standardized tests when:
1)Used as the criterion for the reduction or withholding of any educational funding
2)Results are used to compare students, teachers, programs, schools, communities, and states."
The NEA doesn't want to be held accountable, but thinks itself perfectly capable of setting the standards for home-schooling parents...

Wednesday, June 13, 2001

Bush Caves in to Hillary [Free Republic]

Reprinted from NewsMax.com

Bush Caves In to Hillary
John LeBoutillier
Wednesday June 13, 2001

Tuesday, June 12, 2001

HEADS UP: BOB GLASS (TYRANNY RESPONSE TEAM) "P.I."'s GUEST TONIGHT!! [Free Republic] HEADS UP: BOB GLASS (TYRANNY RESPONSE TEAM) "P.I."'s GUEST TONIGHT!!

Constitution/Conservatism Breaking News Announcement Keywords: TUNE IN TO "POLITICALLY INCORRECT" TONITE - GUEST: BOB GLASS OF TRT!!!
Source: ABC.com
Posted on 06/11/2001 16:37:43 PDT by Mercuria

Wednesday, June 06, 2001

Propaganda Survivor of The Day!


Denver Post letters to the editor

Misguided agenda


The Post article notes that the TRT group's protest tactics are a key reason for the ADL becoming interested in the group. I have been impressed with the ADL's diligence on issues relating to religious persecution. It may be that the ADL's investigation is a good cause. I am, however, convinced the examples of "questionable tactics" that the article gave are being handled differently by the local press than the same tactics would be if this were a left-wing group.

The example of members of the "Tyranny Response Team protesting at Boulder City Hall wearing black shirts with stars, similar to the kind Jews were forced to wear in Nazi Germany," and the drop in attendance at the Million Mom Marches across the United States due to other TRT counter-demonstrations are hardly new to the game of protest. In fact, if this were a leftist cause, one would be surprised if the protesting group's tactics were mentioned in the news piece at all.
I am not a member of the TRT or the NRA and I do not personally feel the need to arm myself with handguns or other weaponry. I am, however, a veteran and a patriot who is very tired of the news media's one-sided march against the right to own and bear arms. I see these subtle and judgmental articles as evidence that the news media has an agenda other than reporting "just the facts."

CRAIG WOLVERTON
Westminster



Videos

:: Rebel Evolution ::

2005 Liberty Film Festival Short-Doc Nomination: :: Sealed For Your Protection ::

:: Boomerang ::

:: Fort Hood Documentary

Remembering A Massacre
::

:: Sarah Palin Rocks Texas

for Governor Perry
::

:: Texas Starts with T

The Tea Party in 12 Easy Minutes
::



Clips and Interviews

:: Governor Rick Perry:

On the Tea Party Movement, Senator Hutchison, and Debra Medina
::

:: Breitbart's Challenge to New Media:

Destroy Those Who Would Destroy You
::

:: Andrew Breitbart:

Time To Start Returning The Punches of the Bully Media
::

:: Rick Perry / Austin Tea Party

On Secession and "Right Wing Extremism"
::











:: Follow me on Twitter ::



:: Unspun with AnnaZ on BlogTalkRadio ::

:: Unspun podcast on iTunes ::