Sunday, December 23, 2001

Tyranny by design (property rights under attack in Old Towne Orange, CA)
NAACP considers SUING Seattle school district over poor minority achievement
"The WAR On Boys": Feminist Gloria Steinem Says, "We need to raise boys like we raise girls."
Arafat calls on Pope for backing in Christmas showdown with Israel
Failed Jet Bomber Charged With Assaulting Crew: TERRORIST FACING DEVASTATING 20 YR SENTENCE
Torch touches America's heart
Police chief wants noncitizens as cops{"people who have not sworn allegiance to the U.S} [Free Republic]
Slain Teen Wasn't Drug Raid's Target (19-Year-Old Was Unarmed And Asleep Before Deputy Shot Him)
The Unraveling of Scientific Materialism
Lithuania Flourishing Ten Years Later (ready to join NATO and E.U.)
Boys just want to have violent toys (humor liberals won't find funny at all)
Christians a 'hate group'
Substance in shoe of passenger on flight diverted to Boston tests positive for explosives
Man arrested on US plane tried to board day before: officials

Friday, December 07, 2001

Gun Ctl Failure: Gun Deaths in LA County Rose 9% in 2000
National Review Gets Borked
Indonesian Christians Flee Muslims
Terrorists in America [Free Republic]
NY Times: Historian's Prizewinning Book on Guns Is Embroiled in a Scandal (Bellesiles)
Gun Control Group Launches Campaign
Religion/hubbard heinlein bet
They're Christians ... So don't mention the season
They're Christians ... So don't mention the season
Emerson Case Being Appealed to the Supreme Court!!!
What is Scientology and why is it viewed in a negative light?
Emerson Case Being Appealed to the Supreme Court!!!

Monday, December 03, 2001

Teachers Union Bashing US In Classroom
FIVE-MONTH-OLD GIRL RAPED IN JO'BURG ("Chaos" in SA, "dozens" of children raped over weekend)
Arkansas Governor Creates 'Tax Me More Fund'
Ashcroft and the Second Amendment
Fox Portrays a War of Good and Evil, and Many Applaud
SOUTH AFRICAN WARNS AMERICANS
ZIMBABWE WHITES FINISHED
CA: social worker panics, weapons seized, couple sues city
Masses threaten civil disobedience
Swiss[Patriots] Reject Army Proposal (78% Refuse To Disarm Disband Militia-Style Army!)
FLUSHING PUBLIC SCHOOL DISCRIMINATES AGAINST CHRISTIANS
Home Is Where the School Is
Peace Rally Held In NYC After Terror Wave In Israel

Friday, November 02, 2001

UPRISING
The Danger Within: Militant Islam in America
The Danger Within: Militant Islam in America
London Urged to Give Dome to NY (Guilani Adm. talking Winter Dome for Ground Hero)
Major Barbara (Review of Ms. Olson's last book)
U.S. adds Hamas and Hezbollah to list of terrorist groups
Court: three strikes law produces cruel and unusual sentences
Comfort in "Militia' Whispers
Arabs From Detroit May Have Known About Sept. 11 Attacks
BABY has HYSTERECTOMY after GANG RAPE [Child Rape Common]
Northwestern Alumni Withhold Money (over terrorist on faculty)
********OFFICIAL UNSPUN WITH ANNAZ AND MERCURIA THREAD: RADIOFR!!!!!!!!!******

Saturday, October 20, 2001

Steven Emerson: 'Don't ask for me by name'- Expert on militant Islamic groups
VH1 - The Concert for NYC; Post your thoughts
America's city of Angels haunted by visions of the apocalypse
Gay rape agony
Navy Bomb Handler is back with more Graffiti! (Human Rights Campaign really mad now)
Let me introduce Dr. Thomas Sowell
Bush team dismantling Clinton's PC women in combat endeavors
Some veterans upset over decision to burn World Trade Center flag
Clarion Call to Christians in the Freeper Wars: How to Win the Culture War--Who, then, is Our Enemy?
Bush just said "Let's Roll"!!!!!

Friday, October 12, 2001

David Shippers: Government Had Prior Knowledge
Cornel West: Twin Tower Aid Same as Slavery Reparations
Alan Dershowitz: Why Fear National ID Cards?
Things Seen and Unseen
House Floor: "[If] there is no dead baby in this picture...vote [for the one-victim amendment]" [Free Republic]
Children 'Horrified' by Pro-Life Talk
Are There Hidden Messages in GWB's Speeches?
Afghan women live as slaves (minor gag alert)
Remember this? When Jeffords told W: "You'll be a one-term president."?? W: "Nice talking to you."
U.S. General: Bombing Halted for Muslim Holy Day [Free Republic]
Headlines? Or HeadLIES?!
Dragnet Yields The Chilling, Alarming.
Police, gun groups may support concealed-weapons deal
TWO VIEWS FROM MUSLIM PHILADELPHIA [Free Republic]
AMI Employee says "It was Terrorist Attack" and Crits Palm Beach Officals
Gun Executive Says Brady Center Misled Media on Status of Lawsuits
Berkeley Politician Criticized for Quote [Free Republic]
Intercepted Communications Give Credence to FBI Warning

Sunday, September 30, 2001

Mexican vendors do brisk 'bin Laden is my hero' T-shirt sales [Free Republic]
UCLA FREEP OF ANTI WAR PROTESTERS [Free Republic]
I Pledge Allegiance To The Earth..........What! [Free Republic]

SCREAMING BLQOTD ALERT!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Oh, gosh, this one's painful.


In her motion she wrote: "the events of September 11, 2001, have dramatically demonstrated that ultimately we are all part of the same world community without national or ethnic distinction..."


I don't think this woman was watching the same channel as the rest of us.

Saturday, September 22, 2001

Study Finds Increasing Number of Crossers at Mexican Border Are From Other Countries [Free Republic]Study
Finds Increasing Number of Crossers at Mexican Border Are From Other Countries




Published:
Sep 22, 2001


TUCSON, Ariz. (AP) - The illegal entrants being caught by the Border Patrol
along the Arizona sector of the boundary increasingly are from nations other
than Mexico, officials say.

"We don't know what it means," spokesman Rene Noriega said Friday.

Total illegal entrant apprehensions within the Border Patrol's Tucson sector
- all of the Arizona-Mexico border except the southwestern corner near Yuma -
are down about 26 percent, from 601,879 last year to 443,910 this year.

At the same time, the number of other-than-Mexican detentions has grown by 42
percent, from 2,032 last year to 2,886 this year.

Most of the non-Mexican migrants are from El Salvador and other parts of
Central America, but agents have picked up people from all over the world,
including the former Soviet Union, Asia, and the Middle East.

Ten Egyptians were arrested recently near Douglas. Each had paid $7,000 to be
brought from Guatemala into Mexico and then across the border, Border Patrol
spokesman Rob Daniels said.



Pat Buchanan on Immigration



Stop the invasion from the south; limit immigration


Buchanan said his exclusion from the three televised debates between
Bush and Gore kept viewers from a real discussion of issues like immigration.
“One of the great social crises of this country is unrestricted immigration
and an invasion from the south,” he said. “I will cut back legal immigration
to 250,000 a year and I will defend America’s border, if necessary with
American troops.”
Source: Zachary Coile,
San Francisco Examiner Oct 27, 2000

Use troops to stop illegal immigration


Buchanan said America needs leaders who will “halt illegal
immigration cold at our borders even if we have to have troops. We need to
repair, rebuild and restore the melting pot.”
Source:
Kristen Hays, Associated Press Jul 27, 1999

PLATFORM - KEEPING OUR SONS AND DAUGHTERS OUT OF WAR

AMERICA'S SOVEREIGNTY IS MORE IMPORTANT THAN OUR TRADE

AMERICA IS ABOUT MORE THAN MONEY!


" Our vital national interests are the security and sovereignty of the
U.S.A. Now that the extraordinary era of the Cold War is over, we need a more
traditional American foreign policy for more traditional times to keep us out of
the kind of wars that have destroyed every other great power in history.

In the words of John Quincy Adams, our greatest Secretary of State,
"Wherever the standard of freedom and independence has been or shall be
unfurled, there will [America's] heart, her benedictions, and her prayers be.
But she goes not abroad in search of monsters to destroy."

When U.S. interests are threatened, or our citizens attacked, or our honor
impugned, America will fight-
but we will not commit our forces carelessly or
sacrifice American soldiers to save the faces of foolhardy interventionists.

We will withdraw from all United Nations and global organizations that do
not serve U.S. interests. Not one dime from the International Monetary Fund will
go to prop up corrupt foreign regimes or countries hostile to the United States.
And not one United States soldier will be forced to swear allegiance to an
international organization."





Wednesday, September 19, 2001

No national pride inspired in US Muslims [Free Republic]

Mohamed Aissaoui, a son of New York City, wants to be a politician when he grows up; whatever else he lacks, the rhetoric is there already.



"The only take you can have on it is as a Muslim," says the 14-year-old outside Al Qaraween Islamic bookstore on Atlantic Avenue, Brooklyn, several blocks of which is a heavily Islamic neighbourhood.


"You're Muslim first and American second. We can only do as our religion says: we should fight back."

Saudis Cast Doubt Over FBI List of Hijackers [Free Republic]

DUBAI (Reuters) - Saudi officials and media have cast doubt on the credibility of a list of 19 suspects named by U.S. investigators as suicide hijackers, saying some of them are alive and innocent.

The FBI last week identified 19 men as hijackers, including seven trained pilots, who it said commandeered the four passenger jets used in the attacks that left nearly 6,000 were dead and missing. Although the FBI list did not provide the nationalities of the suspects, Gulf officials and analysts said the family names appeared to indicate that many of them were Saudi nationals. "The haste in publishing the names of suspects in the attacks has made the media fall into the error of involving innocent people, especially Saudis, who later proved that they were innocent," said Prince Mit'eb bin Abdullah bin Abdul-Aziz, deputy commander of the Saudi National Guards. The apparent errors over the names have strengthened a belief in the Gulf that the real attackers used false or stolen passports and documents.


A Saudi Foreign Ministry official said authorities in the kingdom had doubts about the list, just before Foreign Minister Prince Saud al-Faisal flew to Washington to help U.S. efforts to hunt the perpetrators of the attacks. "We have our own doubts because many of those implicated have turned out to be alive here or elsewhere," he said. Saudi newspapers have published interviews and pictures of at least five of those who appeared on the FBI list since it was released Friday.


Monday, August 27, 2001

Sharp rise in parents saying no to vaccines [Free Republic]
EXCELLENT POINT: The FBI Can't Be Trusted to Vet Judges [Free Republic]
COMMENTARY

The FBI Can't Be Trusted to Vet Judges


When
a spy agency knows personal secrets, it has the potential to influence judicial
decisions.

By STEPHEN YAGMAN, Stephen Yagman, a Venice Beach federal civil
rights lawyer, was special prosecutor for the state of Idaho in the Ruby Ridge
prosecution of an FBI sniper



Serious people of all political stripes should question
whether it is appropriate for the FBI to continue to be the agency that vets our
federal judges.

In the past 10 years, the FBI has brought itself into
disrepute and disgrace, yet its false pride continues unabated.

One need
not go back to the days of yesteryear to question the bureau's competency and
integrity. Back then, J. Edgar Hoover's FBI not only Red-baited, it denied that
the mob existed and refused to investigate federal civil rights violations--all
the while righteously blowing its own horn.

For years, the most glaring
example of bureau misconduct was the famed Rosenberg espionage trial, where, in
an attempt to influence the outcome and ensure the death penalty, Hoover had
illegal conversations with the judge overseeing the case.

The FBI today
continues to be an incredibly effective propaganda machine, having mastered the
techniques it learned from its erstwhile paper tiger enemy--the Soviet
Union.

Some recent examples:

* Ruby Ridge. On Aug. 22,
1992, FBI agents surrounded a broken-down cabin in northern Idaho and killed an
unarmed woman holding a 10-month-old baby by shooting the woman in the
head.

No legal consequences befell the sniper who fired the fatal shot,
nor were his superiors punished for writing clearly unconstitutional rules of
engagement that made the fatal shot possible.

* Waco, Texas. On
April 19, 1993, the FBI stormed the Branch Davidian compound. When it was done,
more than 80 men, women and small children were dead.

Though then-Atty.
Gen. Janet Reno took full responsibility for what the FBI did, it later became
clear that Reno had been duped by the agency into believing the actions it
proposed taking had little risk.

* Wen Ho Lee. In 1998, the FBI
caused the jailing--mostly in shackled solitary confinement--of Taiwan-born
American scientist Wen Ho Lee.

When Lee finally got his freedom after
nine months, the federal judge chastised the FBI, among other government
agencies, for misleading him.

* Robert Philip Hanssen. In 2000, it
was learned that long-time FBI counterintelligence agent Robert Philip Hanssen
was a Russian spy whom the bureau itself had been unable to identify or catch
and whose spying had resulted in a number of assassinations.

Once Hanssen
was caught and charged, the FBI made sure a quick plea bargain was worked out so
that the fiasco would go away quickly and quietly.

* Timothy McVeigh.
The FBI, unconstitutionally and in violation of a federal judge's order,
concealed evidence from Oklahoma City mass murderer Timothy McVeigh that should
have been available to his defense team.

Throughout all this, the FBI has
been the agency responsible--using both retired and active agents--for
investigating and vetting federal judicial nominees.

In that vetting, the
FBI interrogates not only the nominees, but also their families, friends,
neighbors and business associates. It gets their tax returns. It learns the most
intimate details of nominees' lives and puts all this information into its
files.

The peccadilloes or idiosyncrasies of those headed for judicial
office--such as the homosexuality of G. Harrold Carswell, the federal appeals
judge from Florida whom President Nixon nominated to the U.S. Supreme Court--can
be held confidentially, or not.

Once a nominee is confirmed and seated on
the bench, just knowing that the FBI possessed such information could influence
his or her decisions.

There is no legitimate reason to, and many good
reasons not to, let the FBI continue to investigate federal judicial
nominees.

It is too difficult to know how the agency might use the
confidential information it gets. Its powers are too great, its mentality and
institutional history too blemished and its competence and credibility too
low.

Any confidence in its integrity is clearly unwarranted.

There
is good reason to establish an independent, joint executive-legislative branch
office to vet federal judicial nominees.

This would ensure that when FBI
agents make their frequent appearances before federal judges to obtain arrest,
search and eavesdropping warrants and to give testimony in criminal trials,
these judges won't feel an inclination or an obligation to do whatever the FBI
tells them to do.

Thursday, August 23, 2001

Scheer Lunacy at The Los Angeles Times [Free Republic]


Re: my post #36 on this thread: Reading the Left Angeles Times, these letters were published in today's Slimes:


About the only stereotype missing from your portrayal of folks down here in Georgia was the potbellied, cigar-chomping, shotgun-toting sheriff ("Obscure Law Used to Jail Day Laborers in Georgia," Aug. 21).

When did acceptance of illegal immigration and loitering become the litmus test for tolerance? It is not a crime to look for work, as one of the self-admitted illegal aliens quoted in the story complains. But it is a crime under federal law to enter the country without permission and to work here. It is a crime in virtually every jurisdiction in this country to loiter. Zoning laws, by definition, restrict what people can do and where they can do it.

"A backlash against immigrants" is nothing more than decent, hard-working citizens demanding that their government enforce laws that protect their jobs, safety and quality of life.

Jane Russell
Atlanta


I had to laugh when I read about the landscaping contractor in Forsyth County, Ga., who hires illegal aliens and says, "But they're not crime people. They're here to work." Since when is entering this country illegally not a crime? As long as the illegals only flooded the Southwestern states, Congress turned a blind eye to it. Now that they're invading the rest of the country, maybe this problem will get the attention it deserves.

Gregory Daniels
Fillmore


Lie Back And Enjoy It? [Free Republic]
What Happened When Well-to-Do Parents Tried to Prep a Public School for Their Kids [Free Republic]

Tuesday, August 21, 2001

Reading the Left Angeles Times: Hugh Hewitt autopsies latest victim of New Media [Free Republic]
Say it Ain't so; Do liberals have a point? [Free Republic]

"I joined the party for different reasons. I found a party that sees me as an individual, not as part of a group. I found a party that puts family first. I found a party that has love of liberty at its core, and I found a party that believes that peace begins with strength."


-- Condoleeza Rice, speaking at the Republican National Convention of 2000.

TIME Cover Story: Home Sweet School [Free Republic]

Wednesday, July 18, 2001

Ashcroft pushes new gun policy: Attorney General reinterprets the Constitution

The “classic” view of the Second Amendment as an individual right was memorably provided by Mr. Justice Story (1842):


“The right of the citizens to keep and bear arms has justly been considered, as the palladium of the liberties of a republic; since it offers a strong moral check against the usurpation and arbitrary power of rulers; and will generally, even if these are successful in the first instance, enable the people to resist and triumph over them. And yet, though this truth would seem so clear, and the importance of a well regulated militia would seem so undeniable, it cannot be disguised, that among the American people there is a growing indifference to any system of militia discipline . . . There is certainly no small danger, that indifference may lead to disgust, and disgust to contempt; and thus gradually undermine all the protection intended by this clause of our national bill of rights."

More recently, Mr. Justice Scalia wrote (in A Matter of Interpretation, 1997):

“...[W]e value the right to bear arms less than did the Founders (who thought the right to self-defense to be absolutely fundamental), and there will be few tears shed if and when the Second Amendment is held to guarantee nothing more than the state National Guard. But this just shows the Founders were right when they feared that some (in their view misguided) future generation might wish to abandon liberties that they considered essential, and so sought to protect those liberties in a Bill of Rights. We may...like elimination of the right to bear arms; but let us not pretend that these are not the reductions of rights.”

Wednesday, July 04, 2001

Parents needing "oversight" by a government agency. A concept beyond frightening. The status of a child's education has nothing to do with it.
Right you are. This is what's behind the PR push in AZ:
B-67. Home Schooling. "The National Education Association believes that home schooling programs cannot provide the student with a comprehensive education experience. When home schooling occurs, students enrolled must meet all state requirements. Home schooling should be limited to the children of the immediate family, with all expenses being borne by the parents/guardians. Instruction should be by persons who are licensed by the appropriate state education licensure agency, and a curriculum approved by the state department of education should be used.[italics mine] The Association also believes that home-schooled students should not participate in any extracurricular activities in the public schools."
See, it's all about power and control, and making sure the parents don't have any. As far as testing goes for public-schooled children, here's another "resolution" adopted by the NEA:
B-55. Standardized Testing of Students. "The Association opposes the use of standardized tests when:
1)Used as the criterion for the reduction or withholding of any educational funding
2)Results are used to compare students, teachers, programs, schools, communities, and states."
The NEA doesn't want to be held accountable, but thinks itself perfectly capable of setting the standards for home-schooling parents...

Wednesday, June 13, 2001

Bush Caves in to Hillary [Free Republic]

Reprinted from NewsMax.com

Bush Caves In to Hillary
John LeBoutillier
Wednesday June 13, 2001

Tuesday, June 12, 2001

HEADS UP: BOB GLASS (TYRANNY RESPONSE TEAM) "P.I."'s GUEST TONIGHT!! [Free Republic] HEADS UP: BOB GLASS (TYRANNY RESPONSE TEAM) "P.I."'s GUEST TONIGHT!!

Constitution/Conservatism Breaking News Announcement Keywords: TUNE IN TO "POLITICALLY INCORRECT" TONITE - GUEST: BOB GLASS OF TRT!!!
Source: ABC.com
Posted on 06/11/2001 16:37:43 PDT by Mercuria

Wednesday, June 06, 2001

Propaganda Survivor of The Day!


Denver Post letters to the editor

Misguided agenda


The Post article notes that the TRT group's protest tactics are a key reason for the ADL becoming interested in the group. I have been impressed with the ADL's diligence on issues relating to religious persecution. It may be that the ADL's investigation is a good cause. I am, however, convinced the examples of "questionable tactics" that the article gave are being handled differently by the local press than the same tactics would be if this were a left-wing group.

The example of members of the "Tyranny Response Team protesting at Boulder City Hall wearing black shirts with stars, similar to the kind Jews were forced to wear in Nazi Germany," and the drop in attendance at the Million Mom Marches across the United States due to other TRT counter-demonstrations are hardly new to the game of protest. In fact, if this were a leftist cause, one would be surprised if the protesting group's tactics were mentioned in the news piece at all.
I am not a member of the TRT or the NRA and I do not personally feel the need to arm myself with handguns or other weaponry. I am, however, a veteran and a patriot who is very tired of the news media's one-sided march against the right to own and bear arms. I see these subtle and judgmental articles as evidence that the news media has an agenda other than reporting "just the facts."

CRAIG WOLVERTON
Westminster

Wednesday, May 30, 2001


My A.M. Coffee Choker of the Day
(courtesy, of course, of the L.A.trine Slimes)


The Second Amendment and Gun Ownership [Letter to the Editor]

Niko and Theo are the two young boys who have been working to ban the sale of ammunition in Los Angeles. I've had the "pleasure" of countering them at the L.A. City Council. They make me craaaaaaaaaazy.

Letter number one was as bad. It's first line will suffice:

It is disturbing to see that Atty. Gen. John Ashcroft gave incorrect advice to the NRA about the 2nd Amendment, saying it gives individuals the right to own guns.


These people are sick.

My letter:

The two letters published on May 30th re: "The 2nd Amendment and Gun Ownership" might have been more suitably prefaced with the title "Revisionism Run Amok".

TV soundbites and seventh grade textbooks are, fortunately, not the basis for Constitutional interpretation. Logic and intellect are.

Lest I be accused of being a Right-Winger, or, worse, a Conservative, let me quote Lawrence Tribe, a Harvard Law School professor, and no hero to the adherents of either of those philosophies:

"Most advocates of gun control have argued that the 'right to bear arms' can reach no further than the Second Amendment's preamble, which calls a 'well-regulated Militia . . . necessary to the security of a free State.' They conclude that the amendment shields only state militias like today's National Guard from Federal authority. According to these people, the rights of individuals to self-defense or to private gun ownership are not constitutionally protected at all. But the Second Amendment reference to the people's 'right' to be armed cannot be trumped by the Amendment's preamble."

It's a question of focus, and educated parsing.

AnnaZ
L.A., CA

Saturday, May 26, 2001


My battle of the day was here:

30 PROOFS & PREDICTIONS OF CREATIONISM/I.D. #1, #2, #3 [Free Republic]

Everything that I observe and experience reaffirms my belief in a Creator. Things like gardenias, hummingbirds, the smell of cut grass, the love that overwhelms me when I look at my family.

I could post a host of articles re: the age of stars, the (slowing) speed of light, etc., ad nauseum... None of that has anything to do with why I believe the way I do.

It is only the last few years that I've paid any heed to creationism or Biblical literacy. However, prior to that you never could have convinced me that I was an evolutionary by-product. And not for lack of trying, either. 17 years of secular schooling should have done the job.

Ultimately it comes down to the world that surrounds me and the response to that within me. I have a mind, and a soul, and a spirit. I do not need any book or well-thought out article to convince me of that. Those things provide the fodder for threads such as these, but my faith stands alone without them.

Peace.

Thursday, May 24, 2001

One-Term George, Take Two! [Free Republic]

Enforce the Bill of Rights.

Wow, gosh, it sounds so... so simple!

But today, unfortunately, enforcing the Bill of Rights -- or the Constitution for that matter -- isn't "compassionate", it's wholly and horribly "partisan", it just doesn't fit under that big, big tent.

I will write a letter to W over the weekend, for whatever that is worth. I encourage Mr. Smith to handwrite the above missive to the President as well.

There is a fear that accompanies approaching the Leviathan that government has become, escaping the confines of the Keyboard Kingdom and acting on one's conscientious inner self. However I fear Civil War II more. I do.

75 Posted on 05/24/2001 21:33:34 PDT by AnnaZ

Wednesday, May 23, 2001


Today's Bonus: Mercuria Rants!

If we were serious about getting rid of these migrant workers, we'd be pushing to repeal the minimum wage. That would drive labor costs down to a point that would make the trip Norte less profitable. Thanks to the Liberals' minimum wage laws, however, we've made illegal immigration big business.

Ahhhh...THERE'S the rub, Redcloak!

A point of agreement between us on this issue!

Of course, don't say that to certain Republicans around here...we'll hear the continual whine about "how can we support ourselves on less than the minimum wage?"

(Good grief! Has the Party Of Conservatives ever sounded MORE like Kennedy and Boxer??)

My dissenter says: "Americans won't do the work."

I say: "Hiring illegal aliens has ENCOURAGED Americans to become lazy because WE have bought into the notion that manual labor is 'beneath us'. When did we become so snobbish and ashamed of work we do with our two hands? Should we adopt the LIBERAL attitude of saying that entry-level or manual labor jobs are to be sneered at?"

My dissenter: "I don't want my kids having to do that work."

Me: "I suppose you PREFER the idea of having a 'two-income' family because giving your kids everything they whine for is preferable to taking the time and energy of instilling a good work ethic in them? Do you enjoy turning your kids over to government authority and having them adopt a lazy attitude because YOU YOURSELF are too apathetic to make an issue of telling your government to keep their paws off your pocketbook...and because you personally have decided that the liberals were right in establishing a traditional household as 'unfulfilling' and 'slavery'?"

My dissenter: "You'd be the first one screaming if the price of lettuce went up. Illegal labor keeps the prices down."

Me: "No, it doesn't. Considering the amount of taxpayer-funded services going to illegal aliens, the 'unseen cost' is just as much as if we paid minimum wage to CITIZENS to work our fields. We are not currently in a booming job market. And people who own fields should never become so cheap and lazy that they are more willing to break the law than work their own fields or pay what is needed to have their fields LAWFULLY worked. And if the minimum wage is too high, start holding some FEET TO THE FIRE and tell your government to get rid of that mandatory minimum wage so we can hire CITIZENS to work our fields."

My dissenter: "Are you crazy? How can we in this day and age live without a minimum wage?"

Me: "Are you lazy? Start holding some FEET TO THE FIRE and tell your government to get their paws off your pocketbook - and out of minimum wage setting - so we don't encourage lawbreakers to employ other lawbreakers. Have it so moms can stay at home with kids, get the government OUT of our personal home lives entirely, and stop promoting the epidemic of 'latchkey kids'."

My dissenter: "But the Mexicans are only coming here for a better life."

Me: "It is not our business to provide a 'better life' - money to send back to the home country and taxpayer-funded services - for people who come here with no intention of becoming citizens. A 'better life' for me - an AMERICAN CITIZEN - would be a government that enforces those laws to keep our borders secure, and that does not encourage lawbreakers from any other nation. It is up to the Mexican people, if they have no intention of being citizens here, to work for a less corrupt government in their OWN country than to try and sponge off of ours."

My dissenter: "You're so uncompassionate!"

Me: "How 'compassionate' are YOU being stating that your chief desire for lawbreakers to be in this nation is because they wash your car and clean your house so cheaply? Don't you think it MORE compassionate to encourage people to be strong enough to make their home countries more tolerable rather than inviting them over to break the law because we are becoming penny-pinching users?"

My dissenter: "President Fox is really working hard to make things better in Mexico. He and Bush have been talking about it. They've been for 70 years with the same corrupt party ruling them. It's going to take time."

Me: "Did you know that La Raza works in concert with people like Villaraigosa to promote their concept of Reconquista...and that President Fox's demands for open borders, migrant worker freedom (i.e., illegal immigrants permitted work here), and illegal alien students at our state universities as 'home state' students with 'home tuition' rates (putting them in a more FAVORED category than out-of-state CITIZENS of the U.S.) falls directly in line with La Raza and its Reconquista ideals of developing Aztlan, an anti-Christian socialistic pagan paradise?"

My dissenter: "YOU BIGOT!"

Me: "Run out of arguments, I see."

(This is an example, pretty much, of how EVERY argument I have re: illegal immigration runs. Eventually, for no real discernible reason, my rejection of the notion of radical "reconquest", my discouragement of lawbreaking, my repudiation of the idea that everything must be bilingual to accommodate immigrants rather than the necessity of their learning English, and my calling on American citizens to "get with it" by holding their government's feet to the fire makes me a "bigot". How boring. How...socialistic.)


25 Posted on 05/22/2001 00:56:31 PDT by Mercuria


Saturday, May 19, 2001

Student removed from class in handcuffs because of drawings Guns! outrageous. Nazi-esque. [Free Republic]

Read the above and then compare to:

Girl Allegedly Raped Inside Bronx School

Source: NY1 tv
Published: 4/30/01


Police say a 14-year-old girl was raped in her intermediate school in the Bronx Monday afternoon. According to the Board of Education, the incident happened just before noon Monday, between classes in a stairwell inside I.S. 158 in Morrisania. Officials say the girl told authorities she was raped by two boys while a third stood by. However, police have charged three boys with rape in connection with the attack. The boys are 14 and 15 years old, and they have been suspended from school for up to 30 days.


18 Posted on 05/19/2001 11:28:38 PDT by AnnaZ
The Feminist Path to Hell: "Rewriting 'The Rules'...for Lesbians" [Free Republic]

My heart breaks for those young girls indoctrinated in the "who needs a man?" philosophy, who are now women answering, "Me!"

My heart breaks for legs spread countless times, habit formed, second dates less and less frequent, not realizing that they've made them unnecessary.

And fine lines set in, and the career is less satisfying, the womb scraped out once or twice now screaming "robbery!"

My generation has been snookered. The upcoming one may be worse.


84 Posted on 05/19/2001 13:30:16 PDT by AnnaZ

Friday, May 18, 2001

Boneheaded Liberal Quote of The Day!!! [Free Republic]

From the article:

Uprising Has Been a Call to Arms for Nervous Israelis


By SORAYA SARHADDI NELSON, Times Staff Writer




"People feel less safe. It's like wartime,"
said Yael Dayan,

a liberal member of parliament
who spearheaded stricter gun ownership laws in the 1990s

but also owns a .22-caliber Beretta.

"It doesn't mean that it's useful to have a gun.

It's just a question of feeling safer."

Read between the lines, with AnnaZ

Sometimes the "Million" (sic) Moms need help with press releases. And, being a kind person, I thought I'd lend them a hand.

;^)



#27


Posted on 05/02/2001 13:33:37 PDT by AnnaZ


Videos

:: Rebel Evolution ::

2005 Liberty Film Festival Short-Doc Nomination: :: Sealed For Your Protection ::

:: Boomerang ::

:: Fort Hood Documentary

Remembering A Massacre
::

:: Sarah Palin Rocks Texas

for Governor Perry
::

:: Texas Starts with T

The Tea Party in 12 Easy Minutes
::



Clips and Interviews

:: Governor Rick Perry:

On the Tea Party Movement, Senator Hutchison, and Debra Medina
::

:: Breitbart's Challenge to New Media:

Destroy Those Who Would Destroy You
::

:: Andrew Breitbart:

Time To Start Returning The Punches of the Bully Media
::

:: Rick Perry / Austin Tea Party

On Secession and "Right Wing Extremism"
::











:: Follow me on Twitter ::



:: Unspun with AnnaZ on BlogTalkRadio ::

:: Unspun podcast on iTunes ::