Minnesota Supreme Court Overturns Convictions of Pro-Lifers Who Held Graphic SignsI like this line:
Brejcha added, "It is impossible to convey certain messages, including the message that pro-lifers Rudnick and Otterstad sought to convey - with all its emotional content - without the use of graphic anti-abortion images. The First Amendment protects political speech that is annoying and even offensive, including speech that stirs people to anger or produces deeply unsettling effects. Those who disagree with a speaker's message must not suppress or criminalize it, but answer it with more speech."
Videos
:: Rebel Evolution ::
2005 Liberty Film Festival Short-Doc Nomination:
:: Sealed For Your Protection ::
:: Boomerang ::
:: Fort Hood Documentary
Remembering A Massacre ::
:: Sarah Palin Rocks Texas
for Governor Perry ::
:: Texas Starts with T
The Tea Party in 12 Easy Minutes ::
Clips and Interviews
:: Governor Rick Perry:
On the Tea Party Movement, Senator Hutchison, and Debra Medina ::
:: Breitbart's Challenge to New Media:
Destroy Those Who Would Destroy You ::
:: Andrew Breitbart:
Time To Start Returning The Punches of the Bully Media ::
:: Rick Perry / Austin Tea Party
On Secession and "Right Wing Extremism" ::
:: Follow me on Twitter ::
:: Unspun with AnnaZ on BlogTalkRadio ::
:: Unspun podcast on iTunes ::
No comments:
Post a Comment